On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:06:54 -0500, nospam wrote:
> socks.
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:15:25 -0500, nospam wrote:
> they pose a significant safety hazard and/or have poorly regulated
> output.
Hi nospam,
Responding to the more recent post of yours above on this topic...
*This is a very important post which _only_ adults will comprehend.*
<
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3344225charger03.jpg>
What's interesting, nospam, is that you _agree_ wholeheartedly with me!
o Your very words, unbeknownst to you, _prove_ you agree.
o I'll wager that you, yourself, don't even _comprehend_ that you agreed!
The fact is:
o *Apple turned a dead woman into a brilliant marketing branding coup!*
Let's see if _you_ can realize what you & I just said, nospam.
You just said, verbatim:
"they pose a significant hazard"
And, you said:
"they may have poorly regulated output".
Right?
Now, let's see, as an adult, what I said:
I said it was a "brilliant marketing coup"
And:
"Because it made people _feel_ safe"
By trading in "unauthorized" chargers...
for "authorized" chargers (hehhehheh).
My point is _clearly_ that there is absolutely nothing unsafe
about _my_ clearly unauthorized chargers!
In fact, for all _you_ know, nospam, they could be safer!
Clearly, I said "here's a picture of _my_ real-world chargers"
I then I clearly implied:
If I traded in the two non-authorized chargers,
Would an authorized charger be _any_ safer?
Where _every_ rational adult would _know_ the answer.
o Remember, my chargers are very real
o The point is they are NOT a cherry picked 1 out of a million
o That means my chargers are _not_ a marketing gimmick
My chargers happen to exist in the real world in droves.
o Not a cherry-picked bad charger - which is _all_ you know, nospam
Since that's _all_ you know, nospam, I realize you actually agree
o Because even you, nospam, know _my_ real chargers are safe!
To back that up, since I always speak reliable facts,
here's a picture of the certification seals of _my_ very real chargers...
<
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=9611828charger02.jpg>
What you see there are four random chargers in my house:
1. Apple branded 5 Vdc, 1 Amp (small cube, "Made in India")
2. Apple branded 5.2 Vdc, 2.4 Amp (larger, "Made in China")
3. LG branded 9 Vdc, 1.8 Amp + 5Vdc, 1.8 Amp ("Made in Vietnam")
4. Volt branded 5-port 5 Vdc, 2.4 Amp ("Made in China")
*Are you going to go full DK on us & _dispute_ those facts?*
(Or can we _not_ waste our time disputing those are facts?)
Here's what one adult would say to another adult, nospam,
when we're discussing the "brilliance" of Apple MARKETING.
*ADULTS WILL NOTE THE LOGIC IN THE ARGUMENT BELOW*
Dear nospam,
Tell me _how_ you come to the conclusion that _my_
very real very real world actual real in my hands pile of
"unauthorized" chargers, are _any_ less safe than those
authorized chargers in my hand that happen to be
"Designed by Apple in California"?
*NOTE TO ADULTS:*
I posit the _only_ way nospam can make that claim is to
actually use the _same_ brilliant argument that Apple did
when Apple turned a dead woman into a brilliant branding coup!